Another reason the “practicality” argument re: misogyny in costume design sucks

Like Conan the Barbarian is wearing this

image

and no one questions his badassitude and it’s still a power fantasy, not him being sexually objectified.  In fact it makes him look like MORE of a badass because he can wear tiny impractical leather shorts and he still ends up with nary a scratch.

I don’t want women to have to be wearing “OMGZ SUPER PRACTICAL” armor to be believable as heroes.

You see what I mean?  I want to be able to remain a power fantasy and not a sex object even in tiny undies.  

I want you to BELIEVE the heroine is tough enough that she doesn’t need full plate armor, because she’s been written as a badass and not a sex kitten… also I don’t want her in a chainmail bikini in a setting where the men get full plate.

This requires more of media creators because it requires them to write three dimensional female characters rather than just letting them raise a few necklines and call it a day.

Leave a comment