I would like to understand how you are an anti-porn advocate and yet you are posting stunning, non-advertisement photos in lingerie? Please explain why you are dressed like a Mormon in you photos?

misscherrylikesthediscourse:

ladybellentina:

This question is like saying if you’re anti pollution why do you continue to breathe? or if you’re a vegetarian why do you own animal’s? It makes zero sense.

Lingerie and body positivity has nothing to do with the sexualisation of women. I’m posting sets that are worth a weeks salary, that are hand made in some cases with the most beautiful and expensive materials. Lingerie is an art and something I have been collecting for 13 years. It as absolutely no correlation with porn.

Nobody in sex work ever wears expensive lingerie, and no lingerie is ever in any way inspired by sex work or even designed by sex workers (Dita von Teese is obviously a kindergardner, not a stripper who did porn). We’re all just out there in the nude, completely separate from good wholesome clean lingerie that was VERY EXPENSIVE. We poor wretched whores are banned from the fancy lingerie game and are not in fact one of the main customer bases of lingerie. Burlesque was actually just a sex positivity gig too and in no way connected to receiving money for sexual services. Leather harnesses have zero to do with sex work. 

I’m not sure what’s worse, the delusion or the whorephobia or the direct profiting from sex work aesthetics while shitting on sex workers. 

Holy shit that SWERF

Leave a comment