is that no one is more concerned with the endorsement of monarchy than with the endorsement of poofy dresses. Personally I am far more concerned about the marketing of monarchy than I am about the marketing of poofy dresses.
Why can’t we have the Lucy and Albert Parson’s movie instead?
idk i thought people thought the princess stuff was problematic because it encouraged passivity and dependence on dudes
(which is weird b/c none of my floofy dress fantasies as a child had anything to do with dudes, but it might be different for other women idk)
also agreed re: lucy parsons disney movie
Neither did mine… except sometimes because it was a way to get to be queen (I had a LOT of fantasies about having a lot of political and military power as a kid… not sure what that was about) and I mean Disney did Newsies which included a number about beating up scabs so it’s not like there’s not a precedent…
Madeira Darling is a snarky mystic, devout Satanist, serious Marxist, laughing dominatrix, and writer from San Fransisco where they live with their boyfriend in a house full of altars to their various demons.
View all posts by Madeira Darling
Thoughts From The Peacock Angel 