Some thoughts about the “DC sex trafficking ring” stuff spreading all over FB this week:
You know statistically, it’s very likely that missing kids are runaways/throwaways (50%), or that they’re reported missing due to a simple miscommunication (38%), or were taken by a non-custodial parent, which typically happens as a kinda revenge against the custodial parent (7%). That’s 95% of cases right there.
Underage people who run away or are kicked out have an increased chance of entering the sex industry, but a study conducted in NYC showed that extremely-few underage sex workers are even pimped: for some kids, doing sex work is actually preferable to whatever shitty things were keeping them trapped at home. I don’t wanna argue about the “ethics” of underage sex-working or whatever, it’s just a reality of what some teenagers do to survive in nearly-impossible circumstances.
Which brings me to another concern about how we ignore the systemic, and much more difficult to address, reasons why kids end up missing. It’s rarely stranger-danger, and more likely something like abuse (physical, mental, sexual, etc.), or a broken child welfare system, or queer kids feeling unsupported at home or whatever.
Politicians and law enforcement and whatever other opportunists love to jump on whatever new sex trafficking panic rears its head (which happens routinely in different forms) as a way to crack down on already-marginalized communities (poor ppl, poc, sex workers, illicit drug users). They arrest a buncha of adult streetworkers and massage girls, tossing em into the inherently-VIOLENT carceral system, and get pats all around for “at least doing SOMETHING”.
And ppl point to sketchy-but-more-benign magazine-salesperson recruitment posters and stuff as proof of trafficking (pix of which a number of folks on my feed have been passing around this week), thinking that that’s what trafficking looks like, just out in plain sight like that (believe me ive had some sketchy jobs like that and so have my friends but they were technically legal and non-sexual! There are tons of ways to economically exploit highschoolers that won’t get you thrown in prison bc “free market” n shit).
-a woc friend who is shy and wants to remain anonymous.
but just a reminder: the stats around trafficking are deliberately vagued up by antitrafficking orgs who stretch the definition of youth and the definition of trafficked, but the info we have gives us no reason to believe that sexual exploitation numbers differ materially from sexual abuse and rape numbers; that is, two thirds of sexual abuse and assault are committed by people known to the survivor or even their family.
if you want to support kids and survivors of sexual violence, you need to be supporting the creation and funding of youth shelters, day centers, drop in centers, the renewal of RHYA and the inclusion of LGBT in the population services it funds, and a total overhaul of the child welfare system AND the DHS: adults in foster homes and developmentally disabled adults are exponentially more likely to be sexually exploited and abused than almost any other category of adult.
(via clarawebbwillcutoffyourhead)
she also says “But it just seems like the means to the end have to be considered, and also whether or not the net result is positive…like, is this gonna lead to some massive increase in funding and increasing powers of DC Police? What happens then, what do they do with all that money and power? Will that result help fewer kids run away from home, and how?”
and I want to remind you again that the greatest, best funded, and most exhaustive investigation into child sexual exploitation every year turns up hundreds of consensual adult sex workers and about 100-160 runaway youth, most of whom weren’t reported missing from home and aren’t necessarily categorized as sexually exploited, just “found” and returned to the homes they ran away from or the foster care system. the numbers of actual underage victims are dwarfed by the hundreds upon hundreds of “pimps”, every single year, which does lead a thinking person to ask what exactly is going on.
(via clarawebbwillcutoffyourhead)
and i will answer that thinking person!!
because of the way trafficking and pimping are defined, anyone helping, supporting, or taking money from someone exchanging sex is a pimp or a trafficker (depending on who is prosecuting) which does leave social services open to the charge of trafficking which is why you wont find a single youth social services agency in Oregon that will even give a runaway kid FOOD unless the kid discloses the location and contact info of the family. if they do that, they’re opening themselves up to all kinds of legal trouble, while the trafficking law here has been broadened to the point where it now legally includes a stay at home spouse who has sex with a partner who pays for everything.
it’s not hard to find traffickers and pimps when you’re trying that hard to create them.
what else am I to conclude, SIRE, but that you first create conditions that allow children to be abused with impunity and to choose between abuse at home or abuse in foster care or potential abuse on the streets; and then you punish them and their support network as criminals for their very survival tactics?
Thoughts From The Peacock Angel 