People rarely think about the engineering of gala gowns, or of fashion at all. This is part of a larger problem of treating traditionally feminine interests as non-science-related. Baking is practical chemistry, knitting is manual programming, makeup is about crafting optical illusions, and adjusting pattern sizes relies on algebra.

But gala gowns never appear alongside the ubiquitous thrown baseball in physics books, or pop up as exam questions. As copyright library Nancy Sims pointed out to me on Twitter, while plenty of spacial reasoning tests ask which pieces fold into a cube, none ask which set of pattern pieces would fit together into a pair of pants.

how many posts i got through in sfw tags before seeing nsfw

princess–kinkshamer:

with safe search off:
pink – 0
princess – 0
cute – 0 or 7, depending on what you count
sparkle – 0 (it was p*rn of a child character too!)
baby – 20
kitten – 2
kitties – 0

safe search on:
pink – 2
princess – 4
cute – 0 or 10, again depending (one was lingerie, one was porn)
sparkle – ~20 
baby – i didnt see any! nice
kitten – 2

To reiterate I am 14. 

Your kink is not staying in the bedroom. And your kink is being exposed to minors. 

When was this posted/what was the methodology? Cause I just got through 21/23 images without seeing nsfw for kitten using the search thing and looking at the most popular posts (I couldn’t decide if a shirtless furry lion dude was nsfw) and that was with safe search off.

With safe search on I got through more than 40 for pink (estimated, got bored and stopped counting after awhile)

Not saying this isn’t a problem, but I think staff might have gotten better at safesearch.  Princess was roughly 20 or 3 depending on whether you count a post mentioning nothing particularly sexual (sleeping in a boyfriend’s arms) but tagged dd/lg