Things That Anarchists Say to Me in Private But Never Repeat Publicly

I’m not sure if this article’s point is that “anarchists say shitty stuff in private” or “These grievances are ones people feel scared to bring up” it’s interesting either way.

1) “Call-out culture was developed to allow activist groups to confront leaders who abused their privilege, but now it is being used to settle petty scores on the level of interpersonal politics. I now have a hard time believing some people when they make call-outs because I have seen too many that were based on nothing. Call-outs have become a way to acceptably inflict social violence and rarely are followed up in any way resembling transformative justice because people are not interested in doing the hard work of working with those who are called out.”

I’ve seen this one happen, often to deflect criticism from the accuser by misdirection.  It’s a mess.

2) “As a white person, if I don’t automatically agree with whichever person of color is directly in front of me, I run the risk of being labelled a racist. This is a result of good intentions where we want to center people of color and their experiences, but it makes no sense because people of color are not a monolithic block who all agree or share the same experiences. I am basically forced to perform a kind of double-think where I am expected to be able to agree with multiple conflicting viewpoints at the same time – or at least pretend to.”

I feel like this one is often a thing that sort of signals “hey this isn’t really my issue” or at least is more about not talking over people

5) “Calling people out for using the wrong language, for example saying ‘biological female’ instead of ‘person assigned female at birth’, is harmful and makes no sense because not everyone has access to the same information, they’ll never learn if they’re excluded, and the ‘correct’ languages changes every couple of years anyway. People don’t want to be associated with us because they see how punishing we are to each other and it turns them off.”

and like making people feel safe and respected is a balancing act, like saying something misogynistic to a woman because you’re uneducated and don’t have the privilege of being educated on that subject means that like on the one hand the woman feels unsafe because misogyny, and the person without education on that issue feels unsafe because they’re being jumped on for a lack of education they didn’t have access to, and like ultimately there isn’t an easy answer to this stuff, it’s a balancing act.

8) “Who cares about who you personally fuck when we’re talking about a broad political movement? Get off the ego trip. What we want is health care, affordable housing, jobs, prison abolition, immigration rights, sex workers rights, and the end of capitalism. ‘Queer’ has become so fashionable that it’s being confused with ‘radical’.”

This one just feels uncomfortable to me, it seems like there’s a failure to acknowledge violence done against LGBTQETC people

10) “We’ve completely failed to build frameworks for accountability and transformative justice, and instead rely on callouts and social exclusion that replicate the prison system without the benefit of having trials.”

Like this overstate the case a wee bit, like I see your point, but like the prison system is really really horrible, but like the witch hunt atmosphere of a lot of spaces is really gross.

Things That Anarchists Say to Me in Private But Never Repeat Publicly

Also I think something’s gone really wrong with our way of working and exercising

Both are a punishment, a horrid means to a desirable end. This way of doing things is unsustainable and soul destroying. Like running really fast when it’s not an emotionally fraught and self flagellatory experience is fun, it’s like being on a ride and also like stretching when you’re stiff. It feels good. But instead of running for the joy of it, or skipping rope to amusing chants or trying to roll a snow ball bigger than we are, our approach to physical activity is to go to a grey place and hate ourselves for failing to attain the rock hard abs that we see as virtue, by performing dull repetitive unpleasant actions that may be the most efficient way to attain the result but suck all the pleasure from movement just as capitalism sucks all the joy from work. If we did not make our value dependent on on working or exercise we would simply tend to do these things for the joy of them. If we did not almost purposely make these experiences grey and miserable they would return to their natural tendency to be pleasurable

Also like even if I somehow managed

To become a member of the exploiter class, I wouldn’t be happy under this system. Because the stress of attaining power in this system when you’re not born to it is stressful, there’s the fear of returning to your place among the downtrodden and I cannot be truly happy when so many people suffer so much. I want luxury, freedom from want, freedom from fear of want, and I want that for everyone

I’m Reading A Thing About The Mujeres Libres and It’s Making Me Think About Tactics

Like I think organizing effective community based, leaderless useful shit is a really important way of advertising “Hey, our stuff isn’t just a bunch of nice ideas that can’t be implemented, look at our example” and also allows people to practice self organization and self rule to prepare for the responsibilities of a stateless society. We need to take pride in building practical, useful structures for cooperation and mutual aid.

Like I think it might actually be important to keep our buildings in good order and ourselves looking put together (put together doesn’t mean traditional, it just means like maintaining the roots on your blue hair, and laundering ones trousers and such) whenever possible, because it says “Hey, we’re not a bunch of vague dreamers, we can do stuff, we’re energetic” which I mean is obviously not possible for everyone or in all situations, and shouldn’t be prioritized over other human needs, but IDK.

Also I think it’s important that we look at the science of persuasion, because obviously it’s not enough to get our ideas out there, we need to look at what actually changes beliefs, because what works isn’t always what seems like it should work.

I Think A Thing The Left Needs Less Of

Is religious devotion to untested methods.  The goal is more important than how we get there.

If anarcho-syndicalism gets us to a reduction of suffering, great, if Marxism does that, great, if Marxism-Leninism gets us there, if anarcho-communism gets us there, if Trotskyism gets us there, great great great, but what’s important is people not starving and being happy.

That’s literally it.

Oh and combating fascism.

Like I think we need to not be sure our faction is the ONE TRUE WAY TM, while cooperating to eliminate capitalism.  Absolute certainty in one’s methods leads to shit like Stalin and the disastrous end of the Spanish revolution.

All I want is for the world to be a kinder, happier place.  Theoretical rectitude matters nothing to me 

Like I’m not an economist, I’m not a political scientist and it seems like none of them agree with each other anyway, and so I don’t know which way gets us there, but we don’t have a map and so we need to explore the forest in order to find paradise.

I may have my pet theories, cobbled together from what I like from various people, but I am absolutely not sure of anything but the unquestionable need to eliminate capitalism

So like one of the things I’d do if I were put in charge of creating a lefty paradise

Is start by looking into what stuff there is more demand than supply for, and why (why isn’t there enough, why is it desirable?) and try to fix it. I think we’re able to meet or exceed demand for most things but then there’s shit like silk and gold. Also what if we eliminated the production of inferior cooking knives and only produced good durable sharpanable ones